Let Freedom Ring

Watching the republican debate with Dianne sawyer last week, was like a contest in which candidate would be the worst for gay rights, or rather for human rights.

“I support an amendment to the constitution defining marriage as between a man and a woman!” they proudly declared one after the other.

Decades ago these men would have probably just as proudly declared they supported a ban on interracial marriage.

Both are equally wrong!

I realize that readers of this site are gay, straight, democrat, republican, independent and don’t give a rat’s ass, but I think most folks who read rossi rant care at least a little about human rights.

To amend our constitution should only be done in great matters supporting human rights and the good of Americans, to make America even more for the people, for freedom for justice. Wouldn’t this amendment be about as far the opposite as opposite can be?

Yes I wanted Hillary not Obama and I don’t think the guy is perfect, nor have I thought any president was perfect except for Gwbush junya who was a perfect moron!!!

but at least I know Obama would not support such a travesty as banning the rights of 10% of the country to marry!

When I go to the polls I am going to vote for the person who does not want to vote away my rights as an American.

New York finally got its act together and passed gay marriage and the joy and the wonder and celebration took to the streets and still continues. Marriage equality should be federal. It’s time for America to be the land of the people.

Let freedom ring with rings!